Nepal has a free trade agreement with India (the Indo-Nepal treaty of trade, signed in ). Nepal is a member of the South Asian Free Trade. Nepal urges India Inc to invest more, says BIPA being ratified Promotion and Protection Agreement which will provide more comfort to investors, Location of Nepal in the middle of two thriving economies of the world (India. देश. सम्झौताको शिर्षक, सम्झौता भएको मिति. India, Agreement between the Government of Nepal and the Government of India for the Promotion .
|Published (Last):||17 February 2010|
|PDF File Size:||11.4 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.95 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
At present there is a need of provision IP laws regarding alternative dispute resolution, so that disputes can be settled through negotiations.
The two sides agreed to approach it in a new way with the formation of an EPG Eminent Persons Groupwhich will have four persons agreemfnt each side. The EPG will also look into broader bilateral issues, such as border and economy.
In a meeting between PM Bhattarai and Indian External Affairs Minister SM Krishna earlier on Friday, the Indian foreign minister hinted that the issues of extradition treaty and Air Marshall would be discussed in the meeting between the premiers of two countries.
Nevertheless, the agreement biopa in the interest of the Nepalese and their national economy. I succeeded in explaining to them our position.
You are commenting using your WordPress. As a developing country, Nepal lags far behind in protection and enforcement of IPRs due to its low level of economic and social development. While Nepal has large markets enveloping it and the BIPPA has guaranteed investment certainty to some extent at the policy level, it urgently needs aand fix the others factors restraining investment. In the proper policy context, IPRs are an important component of the general regulatory system including taxes, investment regulations, production incentives, trade policies and competition rules.
At a packed hall in the Constitutional Club, old-school socialists, including those who knew him from his JNU days, wanted to hear from the Maoist leader that he was not going to abandon the cause of the working class and the down-trodden.
Being a close neighbor, India remains the begween trading partner of Nepal. What he perhaps knew already was that he could count on the new-found Indian goodwill towards his party and towards him, a leader who could conclude the much elusive peace process. Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Featured Today In Travel. We have sent you a verification email.
India responded positively, according to officials. Though I came to New Delhi as prime minister, they saw me as a Maoist prime minister. This brings to a close days of hectic negotiations and speculations over the fate of BIPPA, which India has sought to protect security for its investments in Nepal. In categories of work, eligibility for protection are the same. Read Post a comment. Separate courts for Intellectual Property in China, Taiwan, and Malaysia have helped them in terms of effective protection of the copyright.
One of the objectives of entering into the BIPPA with India or any other country was to promote industrialization, create employment in the manufacturing and services sector, increase government revenues and export trade and reduce trade imbalances that will finally help promote the welfare of Nepal and the Nepali people.
The term investment includes every kind of asset, including intellectual property rights. Posted by Chandan Sapkota at To avert confusion, it specifically defines what constitute indirect expropriation having an equivalent effect to direct expropriation without formal transfer of title or outright seizure and how it is determined a case-by-case, fact-based inquiry considering a set of relevant factors outlined in the agreement.
The Nepal-India BIPPA remains in force for ten years and will be automatically extended thereafter unless one of the countries intends to terminate it. It has been learnt that India discussed with Bhattarai the status of two hydel power projects being built by India’s private power firm GMR. You are commenting using your Facebook account. In his minute one-on-one with his Indian counterpart, Singh expressed his concerns over the peace process, security issues and economic cooperation. She said the Nepalese government was committed to providing a climate conducive to investments and ensuring that processes have been streamlined and made business friendly.
This addresses the confusion regarding if we will have to compensate for events internal to firms such as labor strikes and supply-side issues such as increase in cost or decrease in profits or increase in losses resulting from load-shedding.
Various kinds of treaties and accords are needed in conducting the state to state relations. Sharma Oli created a row by saying that Bhattarai kept the Nepalese political parties in the dark over the agreement.
Before breaking Nepal-India BIPPA down to the simplest terms, let me at the outset argue that most of the remonstrations have been outright illogical, misinformed, and pitched to score political points. It is not applicable to compensation claims made before the enforcement of the agreement, which means that some Indian companies like UTL and Dabur Nepal cannot claim compensation for losses already inflicted upon their business.
To ensure protection and promotion of investments, and to encourage capital flows along with the commitment to credible liberal economic policies, countries typically enter into investment protection agreements like BIPPA. IndiaNepalPublic Policy. Now share the story Too bad. Notify me of new posts via email. We have already seen this to hold true in our case as well. But the national laws differ according to the need and demand of their respective nation.
Following a significant bilateral deal to provide protection for Indian investments in Nepal, PM Baburam Bhattarai said he was well aware that the Bilateral Investment Promotion and Protection Agreement BIPPA could invite criticism in Nepal, clearly indicating that the move was a calculated political gamble.
After talks with Indian PM Manmohan Singh and other top leaders, Bhattarai said groundwork has biopa laid to build a new relationship between Nepal and India. Importantly, the self-centered leaders opposing BIPPA should explain how exactly Nepal was dominated and workers rights eroded by signing such agreement with five countries before it was done India.
Dispute resolution could happen both at the level of investors and a contracting party or two governments, i. However, PM Bhattarai said that the meeting did not go futile.
Get real-time alerts and all the news on your phone with the all-new India Today app. Misinformed debate Most of the debate over BIPPA is based on misinformation and inaccurate comprehension of the scope and depth of the agreement.
A loose coalition of individuals and organisations, which actively supported the Jana Andolan, was keen to see him voice his commitment to democracy and human rights. Most of the debate over BIPPA is based on misinformation and inaccurate comprehension of the scope and wgreement of the agreement.