Bas C. van Fraassen The Empirical Stance. The Terry Lectures at Yale University , Fall ; published April ; paperback Paperback available from. PDF | On Jan 1, , Jeffrey Koperski and others published Bas C. Van Fraassen: The Empirical Stance. Bas C. van Fraassen, one of the world’s foremost contributors to philosophical logic and the philosophy of science, here undertakes a fresh consideration of.
|Published (Last):||25 November 2007|
|PDF File Size:||2.63 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||14.44 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Added to PP index Total downloads 66 99, of 2, Recent downloads 6 months 5of 2, How can I increase my downloads? Martin Buber The Eclipse of God. Please find details to our shipping fees here. What Separates Empiricists from Metaphysicians?
Taking an Empirical Stance. Overview Aims and Scope What is empiricism and what could it be? Van Fraassen focuses on the philosophical problems of scientific and conceptual revolutions and on the not unrelated ruptures between religious and secular ways of seeing or conceiving of ourselves. Replies to Discussion on “The Empirical Stance”.
Indeed he is, but pragmatism and existentialism agree in treating understanding as a means to more important ends. Science as Representation and Interpretation. But philosophy should not try to model itself on science.
An Alternative Classification of Philosophies. That emotions play an indispensable role in conceptual revolutions does not mean, however, fraassen such revolutions should be viewed as irrational.
Rudolf Bultmann New Testament and Mythology. Terence Cuneo – – Philosophy Compass 2 6: Sign in Create an account. For Heidegger, it was merely the enabler of technology. Readers of this book are likely to hope that it will soon be supplemented by one in which van Fraassen tells us more about what sort of projects he has in mind, and about their relevance to the academic discipline of philosophy. Like metaphysics, this kind of epistemology tries to see around all future corners by delimiting the possibilities open to future inquiry.
User Account Log in Register Help. Van Fraassen No preview available – Presumably van Fraassen would say that the emotions which were indispensable to effecting conversion from Catholicism to Protestantism were of the same sort as those that facilitated the switch empiricap Aristotelian to Galilean descriptions of motion.
But he has not yet made clear what analytic philosophy might look like once those forces have been overcome. Constructive Empiricism and the Argument From Underdetermination.
Account Options Sign in. The Problem of Epistemic Frailty and Sin. Van Fraassen,The Empirical Stance. But the post-revolutionaries need not think the pre-revolutionaries to stahce been absurd.
But all the objectifying epistemologist can do is attempt to eternalize some presently available discourse—to do, e. Tthe there any, except those assumed by religious people whose faith has not yet been de-mythologized in the manner of Bultmann? What is empiricism and what could it be? Yale University Press Amazon.
Dewey belonged to a philosophical tradition that goes back to Hegel—a tradition that regards the French Empiricl as more worthy of philosophical attention than the Scientific Revolution. Yale University Press, Instead, he turns from Sartre to Feyerabend. My library Help Advanced Book Search. Why Stonewalling Cant Work. Wilfrid Sellarss Irenic Axiology. In one role it maintains orthodoxy and forbids heeding the empiricaal interpretations ingenious minds can concoct.
Doomed to Vicious Circle or Infinite Regress? Recent Faces of Moral Nonnaturalism.